Te recent naïve idea of political action through CBOs and the ensuing online debate aptly indicate our level

of education and awareness. Nevertheless, we need to encourage the debate on political process. No one can

deny the need of unity and patriotism but democracy cannot be built on the foundations of exclusiveness and

aristocracy or oligarchy (in the name of success). More over Hunza is not an isolated island. Its

aspirations, needs, opportunities, challenges, miseries, colonization and destiny are woven with Gilgit-

Baltistan.
 
Hunza’s post 74 experience of is the experience of the marionettes of puppet show staged in the name of

democracy. These self interested representatives serving as and Islamabad, Lahore or Larkana based parties.

Forces of status quo that include the concocted dogmas have not allowed patriotic workers to come forward

and promote a national agenda. Secondly, those who try to find solutions of pure political issues through

apolitical means need to realize that if a surgeon fails to remove the illness from a patient, it does never

ever means that the surgery has failed and that the patient should be handed over to a butcher.
 
 We need to see what bodies we are electing our representatives for? We have been complaining against all

the hitherto ‘elected representatives’ for not doing enough but we seldom criticize the undemocratic system

that makes them powerless and begets corruption. We never criticize them for not having courage to speak the

truth. Those accidently coming to ‘representation’ without any track record of genuine political struggle,

rightly see their source of power in their masters instead of electorate.  Removing ’Mir Family’ out of

power has been the sole agenda of so called ‘modernists’ in post 74 Hunza but they have failed to give any

alternate vision. They have also failed to understand that the abolishing of state was not a democratic

change. It would had been democratic, had it come from within and brought a democratic system of governance

instead. What we earned in return was the loss of the indigenously developed system and over lordship of

numerous new ‘mirs’ instead of one single mir. Since then, we have lost the centrality of thinking from our

own perspective vis a vis major challenges. No doubt, Hunza had lost its independence and sovereignty in

1891 but no one can deny that the internal autonomy under the British installed mirs, was delivering at

least better than the present. How can a direct colonial rule be eulogized that tacitly renders thousands of

people homeless and shoots them on demanding shelter?  This has been the dilemma of the local mimics who

waste their energies for Pakistani parties without the understanding of ground realities.
 
What we need to do unequivocally is to oppose importing alien political parties from Larkana, Lahore and

Karachi. We have followed these outsiders quite long for four decades. At least our new generation should

not follow this mimicry. Begani shadi mein Abdullah deewana.  Its time now to adopt a national approach and

build democratic political institution (party) on GB level. No doubt it seems to be a tall order in the

present circumstances but this is the only solution. There is no short cut to it. This initiative is not

possible through apolitical means either. Hunza is neither James Hilton’s Shangri-La nor has it remained the

traditionally thought dekaran (the well protected orchard) of our ancestors. Hunza alone cannot bring a

change for itself but can take a lead role. Formation of Qaumi Maraka is one such initiative towards

building a forum to further national approach and to encourage democratic political process.
 
The recent move that seems to have been advanced by a certain apolitical sector is a futile utopian thinking

covered in hollow rhetorics. Civil society can play vital role in breeding democratic norms through debate

and advocacy but it can never be substitute for political organizations. NGOs in our region have no doubt

delivered a lot in terms of quality of life but unfortunately there is no denial to the fact that they have

played a disappointing role in depoliticizing the society as a well.

http://gbtimes.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/opposing-the-depoliticization-of-politics/
Opposing the depoliticization of politics

By: Sultan Madad